Soft AE Symposium 2025

Soft Materials, Autonomous Experimentation & Science Policy

image of 2024 Symposium Attendees gathered on the steps of the Singh center

2024 Symposium Attendees

2025 Symposium
Friday, May 2, 2025
9:00 am - 4:30 pm

Glandt Forum
Singh Center for Nanotechnology
3205 Walnut Street, Philadelphia PA

Click here to RSVP

 

nsf logo
Funded by NSF Award #2152205

9:00 am

Chinedum Osuji, PhD
NRT Soft AE Director and PI

9:10 am

Jie Xu portrait

Engineering Electronic Polymers using Self-Driving Laboratory
Jie Xu, PhD, Argonne National Lab

The development of electronic polymers has lagged behind the rapidly growing demand for advanced materials in flexible devices, large-scale printable electronics, and sustainable energy applications. This slow progress stems from the vast design space and complex processing conditions required, making precise design a formidable challenge. Balancing critical properties—like electronic mobility, strength, ionic conductivity, sustainability, and processability—further complicates the development pipeline. To address these challenges, we are pioneering new approaches to accelerate the electronic polymer development pipeline. While AI-driven materials research has seen rapid advances, applying these technologies to electronic polymer design remains challenging, particularly due to the limited data availability stemming from the lengthy design-make-test-analyze cycle in electronics. Our work focuses on accelerating the design of functional polymers by leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and automated robotic experimentation. This talk will highlight research conducted in our self-driving lab, Polybot, covering topics from the inverse discovery of electrochromic polymer structures, the controlled assembly of conducting polymers through solution processing, and the discovery of design principles for mixed-conducting polymers in electrochemical transistors. We will also discuss ongoing efforts to evolve Polybot into a more adaptive system with enhanced human-machine interfaces and as a community resource by building a specialized electronic polymer database.

9:55 am

Lightning Talks Round 1: Soft AE Trainees

NRT group photo 09.08.23

10:30 am

Coffee break

10:50 am

Martin Seifrid portrait

Establishing the Data-Driven Organic Materials Lab
Martin Seifrid, PhD, North Carolina State University

To address pressing challenges in energy and healthcare, we must accelerate the pace of scientific discovery through digital technology, data-driven science, and automation. In this talk, I will discuss my group’s efforts to combine experimental and computational tools to accelerate the design and discovery of organic materials. I will provide an overview of how to build a self-driving lab, from both digital and experimental perspectives. Finally, I will provide a glimpse into my lab’s current research directions.

11:35 am

Arthi Jayaraman portrait

Convergence of Molecular Modeling, Simulations, Machine Learning, and Soft Materials Science in Research and Interdisciplinary Education
Arthi Jayaraman, PhD, University of Delaware

 

12:20 pm

Group Photo

12:30 pm

Lunch

1:30 pm

Debra Audus portrait

Improving Machine Learning with Polymer Science
Debra J. Audus, PhD, NIST

Machine learning as applied to polymer science has shown immense progress, mostly in areas where there are existing large datasets or where datasets can be generated quickly. However, there are numerous interesting problems where the dataset sizes are too small or the need to understand the science behind the machine learning prediction is essential. Here, we aim to tackle both problems by incorporating domain knowledge, in the form of polymer theories, into machine learning models. First, we consider a toy system of polymers in different solvent qualities and compare several methods for incorporating theory into machine learning using a simple, imperfect but easily interpretable theory. Second, we consider the phase behavior of polystyrene in cyclohexane using the foundational Flory-Huggins theory for guidance. We compare three theory informed machine learning methods along with a theory constrained machine learning method. Relative trade-offs and implications on explainability are explored.

2:15 pm

 Lightning Talks Round 2: Soft AE Trainees

group of students in front of the Singh Center clean roomgroup of the fourth cohort in front of the Singh Center clean room

2:50 pm

Vanessa Chan portrait

The Key to Technology Commercialization is not in Technology Readiness
Vanessa Chan, PhD, University of Pennsylvania

In our academic trainings we are focused on tackling the hard science and technology issues. We are measured by the number of peer-reviewed journal articles that we publish, and these are based on the rigor of our scientific research. Traditionally the likelihood of a technology making it to market has been measured by its TRLs (Technology Readiness Levels) which assesses how mature the technology is. The problem is that TRLs do not consider non-technology barriers that must be overcome for a technology to be used in the real world. Barriers such as unit cost economics, regulatory hurdles, availability of supply chain etc.  A complementary framework, ARLs (Adoption Readiness Levels) was created to capture the non-technical challenges that technologies must overcome for full-scale deployment into the marketplace. By assessing TRLs in parallel with ARLs this will help steward technologies along the research, development, demonstration & deployment (RDD&D) or commercialization continuum.

3:35 pm

Russell Composto, PhD
NRT Soft AE Associate Director and co-PI

3:40 pm

Reception